Each Medicare claims processing system contains criteria to
evaluate all claims received for potential duplication. The claims can be placed into two categories:
exact duplicate or suspect duplicate.
Each category is processed uniquely by the Medicare contractor.
CMS
CMS has recently updated the Medicare Claims Processing
Manual, Chapter 1, Section 120: “Detection of Duplicate Claims” based on change
request (CR) 8121.
duplicate claimsAn exact duplicate claim is denied or
rejected, if missing applicable modifiers, automatically by the claims
processing system.
For exact duplicate
denials, professional providers do have appeal rights, but institutional and
DME providers do not.
Suspect duplicate
If a claim is deemed suspect by the initial
system review, the claim is suspended for further review by the Medicare
contractor.
If suspect duplicate
is denied after review, all providers have right to appeal.
Due to the nature of
the service, some claims may only appear to be duplicates. Proper coding of the service with the
applicable condition codes or modifiers will identify the claim as a separate
payable service, not a duplicate. An
example could be modifiers “LT” and “RT” for bilateral procedures.
By utilizing an
advanced Medical Practice Management Billing Software like Iridium Suite from
Medical Business Systems, duplicate claims submissions are easily
prevented. A configurable Claim Scrubber
as found in Iridium Suite will check each service entered and alert the user
immediately if the same service is already on record.
This gives the user the opportunity to
determine if the service is a true duplicate or if the service qualifies for an
appropriate addition of a modifier.
See the information below for details on the process
Medicare utilizes to identify duplicate claims.
Provider of Service duplicate
claims
Exact Duplicate suspect
duplicate
Suspect Duplicate
Institutional institutional claims Claim matches identically on the following data:
1. Health insurance claim (HIC) number
2. Type of bill
3. Provider identification number
4. From date of service
5. Through date of service
6. Total charges (on the line or on the bill)
7. HCPCS, CPT-4, or
procedure code/modifiers Claim matches on
the following data:
1. Beneficiary information
2. Provider identification
3. Same date of service or overlapping dates of service Professional
Professional claims Claim matches identically on the following data:
1. HIC number
2. Provider number
3. From date of service
4. Through date of service
5. Type of service
6. Procedure code
7. Place of service
8. Billed amount
The
criteria for identifying suspect duplicate claims submitted by physicians and
other suppliers vary according to the type of billing entity, type of item or
service being billed, and other relevant criteria.
DMEDME supplies
Claim
matches identically on the following data:
1. HIC number
2. From date of service
3. Through date of service
4. Place of service 22
5. HCPCS
6. Type of service
7. Billed amount
8. Supplier
The
criteria for identifying suspect duplicate claims submitted by physicians and
other suppliers vary according to the type of billing entity, type of item or
service being billed, and other relevant criteria.
Do you know MUE?
Working in medical billing is like being in a bowl of
alphabet soup.
One of the probably less common acronyms is MUE: Medically Unlikely Edit.
Read below to find out what an MUE is, and why you should
care.
what is a medically unlikely edit ?
A medically unlikely edit
(MUE) is an automated claim processing edit that compares the number of units
submitted for a procedure code against the designated maximum units that are
typically reported for that code on the vast majority of appropriately reported
claims.
MUE : The edit is applied to services billed by a single
provider/supplier to a single beneficiary on the same date of service.
No comments:
Post a Comment