Controlling access to Medicare's computer systems by identifying and verifying persons
who try to gain access reduces risk and potential adverse impact that unauthorized or
malicious acts could have on the Medicare program.
Since 1990, Medicare has required physicians and other providers of medical services to
submit claims directly to Medicare on behalf of beneficiaries. The increased workload and
increasing complexity of procedure and diagnostic coding has encouraged physicians to
turn to computer automation to improve efficiency.
Physicians and other medical service suppliers must be authorized to bill Medicare
electronically. Each is given a unique number (submitter number) to use when submitting
claims electronically. We were unable to determine how many electronic claims Medicare
receives directly from physicians and other medical providers or from third parties billing
on their behalf. We found that Medicare can identify providers who have requested and
obtained a submitter number; however, this does not mean that the submitter number
shown on a claim is actually the party that actually submitted claims to the Medicare
system. An unknown number of providers allow billing companies to use their submitter
number. Medicare assumes the provider is sending in claims when, in fact, anyone with a
computer, modem and access to a provider's submitter number and patient's health
insurance number could be sending claims to Medicare. The potential for misuse of
submitter numbers is a vulnerability not adequately addressed by Medicare.
Clearinghouses and Other Third-Party Billers
Audit trails are necessary to trace the flow of data. They identify the source of the claim,
and all persons or parties through whom the claim passed before it was received by
Medicare.
Claims entering the Medicare program via a clearinghouse or billing agency do so using
the provider’s submitter number. Consequently, Medicare is unable to identify most of
the clearinghouses and billing agencies actually submitting claims to Medicare.
We tried to determine how many claims enter the Medicare system from a third party only
to discover that many carriers and intermediaries have no way of knowing who actually
submitted the claim to Medicare. Inability to assess whether a claim came directly from a
provider or passed through the hands of a third party represents a vulnerability in
Medicare program safeguards. Medicare cannot determine whether claims enter their
system from an authorized biller's site and computer or from unauthorized sites and computers. Billing companies, their employees and employees of providers have access to
patient and provider information needed to access the Medicare system. This information
can be used (without a providers knowledge) to generate false claims.
Locating information about clearinghouses, third-party billers or billing services is not
easily done. A manual review of provider applications for a Medicare billing number will,
in some cases, indicate that claims will be submitted to Medicare via a third party. Our
experience, during other studies, is that the information in the carrier’s provider files is
often obsolete or inaccurate.
Many clearinghouses and billing agencies use the same commercial billing software
packages available to hospitals, physicians and other medical suppliers. Some have
developed their own proprietary software. The vulnerabilities discussed in this report
apply to all parties involved in Medicare claims preparation or submission.
In an unrelated study, we were told by State Medicaid Agencies that third party billers and
clearinghouses were an area of concern. Clearinghouses and third-party billers charge by
the claim and States feel that this may serve as an incentive to split claims. At least one
State was concerned that they did not know who actually submitted the claim or from
where the claim was submitted. They felt that anyone with access to a physician’s
electronic billing number and access to a telephone could submit false claims for payment.
More than 30 billing individuals/entities have been excluded from participation in
Medicare and State Medicaid programs. There are also a number of open criminal cases
involving billing agency fraud. In most cases, these companies used the information they
obtained from legitimate providers to prepare and submit false claims. In some cases, the
billing companies totally fabricated claim information and billed for services not rendered.
Other problems with billing companies include unbundling of services, upcoding, adding
services and diagnostic information and billing more than one carrier for the same services
provided to a patient.
No comments:
Post a Comment